Communities Declare Support For 260 Km Superhighway in Cross River, Wants Due EIA Process Followed Communities Declare Support For 260 Km Superhighway in Cross River, Wants Due EIA Process Followed
Diana Okon-Effiong, Calabar   Four communities that will be critically impacted by the proposed Cross River State government 260 kilometres digital super highway have... Communities Declare Support For 260 Km Superhighway in Cross River, Wants Due EIA Process Followed
Rev. Nnimmo Bassey

Rev. Nnimmo Bassey

Diana Okon-Effiong, Calabar

 
Four communities that will be critically impacted by the proposed Cross River State government 260 kilometres digital super highway have declared their support for the project.
 
They, however, want the state government to do so in accordance with a proper Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) procedures.
 
The communities’ resolve came at a three day community dialogue and EIA training programme organised by the Health of Mother Earth Foundation, (HOMEF) led by Rev. Nnimmo Bassey.
 
The communities – Okokori and Edondon in Obubra Local Government area; Old Ekuri and New Ekuri from Akamkpa Local Government area –  also rejected the absolute revocation and acquisition of 10 kilometre right of way of their forest land on either side of the proposed Superhighway.
 
According to them such will threaten their biodiversity rich forest and its resources, the environment and their livelihoods. 
 
At the end of the three day interactive community dialogue and EIA training which took place at Okokori and Old Ekuri from June 9 to 11, the participants and community stakeholders resolved that they “need good roads” but do not “want their cultural heritage destroyed” as they expressed fears that the current plan by the government would do.
 
The resolution which was signed by the Village Head of Old Ekuri, Chief Steven Orji; New Ekuri village Head, Chief Abel Egbe; Edondon Youth Chairman Mr. George Nbeh and nine others.
They also insisted “on active engagement of communities in the EIA process with adequate compensation paid where necessary and to write to government to register their concerns relating to the proposed super highway project”.
 
They also resolved that Community’s Free Prior and informed Consent (FPIC) must be sought in all projects before implementation as they are prepared to “protest and resist any unsustainable forest management practices in the forest rich region”.
 
Accordingly, the state government was advised to “reduce every activity that promotes deforestation” but should “promote forest conservation and regeneration of indigenous trees in degraded areas”.
  
The workshop and EIA training programme also called for a minimized poaching, unregulated hunting and stop to illegal wild life trade in the precinct forest and “reject use of forest lands for large scale plantations, water pollution and the indiscriminate use of chemicals”.
 
They resolved to strengthen the Community Forest Watch for effective community forest monitoring, form a community health monitoring group to ensure sustainable forest management practices and “help to protect, preserve and conserve their forest which provides them with social, economic, spiritual benefits”.
 
They called for “NGOs and International agencies support to build a stronger alliance against the super highway project especially with regard to threats to forests”.
 
The  thrust  of  the  meeting  was  to  build  the  capacity  of relevant community stakeholders  to  discuss issues related to their forests as well as the overall impact.

admin