In a statement by Obi-Datti Campaign Head of Media, Mr. Diran Onifade, the Media Office described as “appalling” the fact that “after a long silence…, (an otherwise) highly reputed analytical entity (like The Economist) would engage in such a counter-intuitive prediction.”
“Every foreign and domestic observers’ report classified the election as egregiously flawed. Such contentions are sufficient grounds for the upturning of the election results by the Presidential Election Petition Court (PEPC), (especially) as sufficient evidence was provided to prove that the election was substantially flawed and did not meet the acceptable standard for a credible election” the Obi-Datti Media Office declared in the statement by Onifade.
“For the EIU to predict otherwise seems utterly self-serving and scripted to meet the political needs and aspirations of APC, the possible facilitator of the report,” the Media Office stressed, stating that the “EIU prediction is beyond partisan; indeed it is most disturbing and unacceptable.”
“By this jaundiced report, the EIU via subterfuge is trying to pre-script a judicial outcome by front-loading its proffered narrative,” the statement added.
“It is clearly obvious that this EIU prediction is a paid-for-advert that canvasses the position of one party among many that vied for the presidential election.
“Even though the EIU also referred to the APC reform agenda losing momentum, Nigerians are not deceived that such analysis is by any means altruistic, when clearly it is the other way round. It is very doubtful that the EIU would endorse the incredulous and shambolic conduct of INEC had it happened within the United Kingdom or the European Union territory.
“Attempting to score cheap points with the passive mention of Mr. Tinubu’s low popularity at 37% of 27% voter turnout does not sufficiently capture the widely held view of proven election irregularities like never experienced in Nigeria’s history.
“Moreover, to opine that the Judiciary would do the unthinkable in the face of proven irregularities while it expects Mr. Tinubu’s reforms agenda to lose momentum, given his fast eroding low-level political capital, goes to show how much value the EIU places on Nigeria as a whole, along with its Judiciary. We reject such a damnable doctrine full of inconsistencies.
“While the EIU presumably might not mind ending up on the wrong side of events, we ask that it should henceforth endeavour to be impartial in its commentaries on Nigeria, or simply put up and shut up.
“Obi-Datti Media office sees this report as not in the interest of Nigeria and inconsequential to the outcome of cases before their Lordships because they are learned and wise enough to discern Jacob’s hand in Esau’s clothing.
“We, therefore, wish to ask EIU to stop staking their reputation by trying to drink from a broken jar which the APC represents in Nigeria’s democracy, and endeavour to be impartial in their commentaries while always striving to be on the right side of history and avoid aligning itself with illegal, corrupt and criminal tendencies that harm and destroy our humanity.
“We urge that it should henceforth endeavour to be impartial in its commentaries on Nigeria.
The Media Office of the Obi-Datti Campaign Organisation has reacted to the report on the outcome of the February 25, 2023 presidential election in Nigeria, recently published by the London-based The Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) with the headline ‘When Brigandage Meets Merchantalism’, pooh-poohing it as “yet another transactional work poorly done.”